Chelsea team analysis: Balancing talent and midfield structure

Chelsea’s midfield has become a complex puzzle. Despite the individual brilliance of players like Enzo Fernández, Moisés Caicedo, and Romeo Lavia, the club struggles to harmonize their talents into a cohesive unit. This is not merely a question of player quality but one of tactical alignment, role optimization, and systemic balance.

Chelsea’s midfield dilemma stems from attempting to incorporate multiple high-profile players who excel in specialized roles but lack synergy when combined. The club invested heavily in Fernández and Caicedo, envisioning them as cornerstones of the team. However, their overlapping skill sets and the need for defensive solidity have created significant challenges.

Fernández thrives in a deep-lying playmaker role where he can dictate tempo and deliver progressive passes. However, his physical limitations become a liability in defensive transitions when paired without adequate support. Meanwhile, Caicedo, an elite ball-winner and defensive presence, shines in a double pivot but struggles when tasked with carrying the creative load. Adding Lavia into the mix offers technical stability, yet his presence shifts responsibilities in ways that often undermine Fernández’s strengths.

The primary challenge? Ensuring all three players coexist without compromising the team’s structure or creativity.

Caicedo’s journey at Chelsea has been marked by adaptation and evolution. At Brighton, he excelled in a double pivot, leveraging his defensive prowess and ability to cover ground. His role was clear: disrupt opposition plays, recover possession, and support transitions.

TWELVE GPT:

Moisés Caicedo is a young midfielder for Chelsea with strong defensive abilities and some attacking potential. At just 23 years old, he excels in bypassing players and is particularly adept at defensive actions, frequently winning back possession. Caicedo is good at progressing the ball, particularly with passes into the final third and playmaking passes, and he shows solid involvement through his defensive actions on the field. However, his attacking contributions are less impressive. He is average in passing quality and providing teammates with scoring opportunities and lacks a significant physical and box threat presence. Overall, Caicedo's excellent defence and ball progression make him a valuable midfielder, but his offensive output and physical attributes need improvement.

At Chelsea, he initially struggled, bearing the weight of high expectations and a record transfer fee. However, recent tactical shifts have allowed him to shine. Paired with Lavia or supported by other midfielders, Caicedo now operates in a more defined role, focusing on his defensive strengths.

His statistics underline his impact: elite metrics in tackles, interceptions, and ball recoveries place him among the best defensive midfielders in the Premier League. This resurgence highlights the importance of system alignment in maximizing a player’s potential.

TWELVE GPT:

Moisés Caicedo is a strong defensive midfielder with exceptional skills in regaining possession and applying pressure. He does not have significant weaknesses in his defensive influence.

Enzo Fernández, Chelsea’s marquee signing, faces a tactical dilemma. At Benfica and in the Argentine national team, he showcased his ability as a deep-lying playmaker, orchestrating play with precise passes and positional awareness. However, Chelsea has often deployed him in advanced roles that limit his influence.

TWELVE GPT:

Enzo Fernández is a young and developing midfielder for Chelsea in the English Premier League. This season, he has demonstrated excellent involvement in play, particularly excels in expected goals buildup per 90 minutes. He stands out in breaking the lines, with a high number of receptions between the lines per 90. He is good at active defence and performs well in counterpressing recoveries and interceptions. His effectiveness is average, but he performs well in high turnovers per low reception. However, Fernández is only average in providing for teammates, passing quality, progression, and bypassing opponents. He is below average in box threat and physical attributes, particularly in maximum top speed. Overall, Fernández is a strong midfielder at involving himself in play and breaking lines, but needs to continue developing his attacking and physical attributes to become a more complete player.

The numbers tell the story. His touches per game have decreased from 94 in his debut season to just 67 this year, reflecting his reduced involvement in build-up play. While his key passes have marginally increased, this improvement doesn’t justify the compromises made to his overall game. Positioned higher up the pitch, Fernández often finds himself isolated, unable to leverage his vision and passing range.

TWELVE GPT:

Enzo Fernández excels at breaking the lines, especially in receiving between the lines and passing from attack to midfield. While his deeper-passing ability and overall line-breaking passes are average, his strengths make him a significant asset in transitioning play.

For Fernández to thrive, Chelsea must reconfigure its midfield to provide him with the freedom to dictate play from deeper areas, supported by defensively robust teammates like Caicedo and Lavia.

Chelsea’s offensive structure exacerbates their midfield woes. The team relies heavily on wide play, with wingers like Pedro Neto and Madueke tasked with breaking down defenses. However, this approach often isolates central players and limits creativity in the middle.

The current setup also places excessive responsibility on full-backs like Malo Gusto, who lack the technical proficiency to operate effectively in advanced areas. This leads to predictable attacks that opponents can easily neutralize. Furthermore, players like Cole Palmer and Fernández are often positioned in areas where their natural tendencies are constrained, reducing their effectiveness.

TWELVE GPT:

Malo Gusto is below average at providing teammates compared to other full-backs. While he is average in some creative metrics, he is weak in key components like key passes, expected assists, and deep completions.

Malo Gusto performs adequately as a full-back with a particular talent for finding space between the lines. Although his passing metrics are reasonable, there's no outstanding contribution beyond his receptions.

For Chelsea to unlock its midfield’s potential, a shift in tactical priorities is essential. Here are some recommendations:

  • Reintroduce the double pivot: A consistent pairing of Caicedo and Lavia in a double pivot can provide defensive stability and allow Fernández to play higher up without compromising transitions.

  • Optimize Enzo Fernández’s role: Deploy Fernández as a deep-lying playmaker with freedom to roam and connect passes, utilizing his vision and creativity more effectively.

  • Leverage positional fluidity: Allow Caicedo to push forward in certain phases, creating numerical superiority in midfield while ensuring defensive cover through Lavia or other disciplined players.

  • Reduce dependency on full-backs: Shift creative responsibilities to midfielders and wingers, ensuring that full-backs primarily focus on defensive duties and overlapping runs.

  • Develop cohesion in attacking zones: Integrate players like Palmer and Madueke into a more cohesive system, reducing reliance on individual brilliance and fostering collective creativity.

Conclusion

Chelsea’s midfield is a microcosm of its broader issues: a team with immense individual talent but lacking cohesion. The club’s success depends on finding a tactical framework that allows Fernández, Caicedo, and Lavia to excel collectively. Achieving this balance will not only unlock the team’s potential but also redefine its identity in a highly competitive Premier League. For now, the puzzle remains unsolved, but the pieces are undoubtedly there.

Previous
Previous

A closer look at Bayern Munich

Next
Next

Match analysis: Manchester United - Chelsea